The Ego Behind Full-Time RTO
Plus, how one day a month in office beats five days a week—if you do it right
👋 Happy Tuesday! For years, leaders have justified full-time RTO mandates with productivity claims, collaboration benefits, and company culture. New research suggests the real reason is simpler—and more personal. This week, we dig into what’s actually driving the push to bring everyone back to the office, and what the data says about whether it works.
In this week’s edition:
🏢 The Ego Behind RTO Mandates
🗞️ Top Flexible Work News
📍 One Day a Month Changes Everything
Current Subscribers: 10,391
Please forward to colleagues and friends!
THIS WEEK’S FLEX FOCUS 🔍
The Secret Reason Bosses Want Everyone Back in the Office, Every Day of the Week
Research from Wharton’s Adam Grant reveals the biggest driver of full-time RTO mandates—and it’s more personal than most leaders admit.
Grant studied thousands of executives and found that narcissism consistently predicts opposition to remote work. Leaders with these traits struggle without in-person presence and the direct validation that comes with it.
But we already know RTO mandates backfire. Studies of 450+ companies show they don’t boost financial returns or productivity. Instead, they push top talent to leave, reduce satisfaction, and discourage new hires. Part-time remote work does the opposite; it boosts employee happiness, cuts turnover by a third and has zero performance cost.
There is a bright spot though. Younger CEOs support remote work at higher rates, and companies founded in the last decade are significantly more likely to embrace flexible arrangements.
The data is clear on what works. The question is whether leaders can curb their ego to follow it.
As Grant puts it, "To maintain a competitive advantage in an increasingly flexible world, it’s time for leaders to put their egos aside and master the art of managing from afar."
Check out Grant’s OpEd, gift link below, to read his research and a collection of links on great ways to make flexibility work.
FLEX WORK QUICK HITS 💥
Stay ahead of the curve with our curated roundup of the trending flexible work stories making waves right now. Here's what you need to know 👇
Fast Company: Nearly half of Gen Z say office work improved their quality of life, shifting how companies frame RTO as a perk rather than a mandate.
Business Insider: Toptal CEO evolved his stance to keep 80% remote, 20% in-person for AI work, finding brainstorming needs intensity, but execution doesn't.
Wall Street Journal: RTO mandates from big companies haven’t moved the needle; remote work stabilized at a new baseline with younger CEOs keeping hybrid while older executives push back.
FREE WEBINAR 🧠
Built for People: How to Design Work and Workplaces to Unlock Potential
AI is rewriting how work gets done — and the organizations pulling ahead treat it as a people transformation, not a tech rollout. That puts HR, leadership, and the workplace at the center.
Join JLL CHRO Laura Adams, BCG Senior Partner Debbie Lovich and Work Forward CEO Brian Elliott live as we explore how leaders are redesigning the work and the workplaces that help people learn, collaborate, and belong — drawing on BCG research and JLL's experience reshaping roles, skills, and spaces for a global workforce. We’ll also dive into JLL’s Future of Work Survey research releasing in early July.
You'll leave with concrete, research-backed ideas for leading people through constant change, and practical insights on workplace flexibility solutions
📅 July 15, 2026 at 12pm ET / 9am PT
FLEXPERT INSIGHTS 🧠
The Value of One Office Day a Month
In the latest research paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a randomized controlled trial of 248 customer-service employees found that one coordinated day in the office per month increased productivity by 7.8% and cut attrition by a third. But here’s what matters more than the numbers—why it worked.
Employees spent an extra 36 minutes talking to colleagues after the workday. They were more likely to get manager feedback. Desk neighbors who were randomly assigned during office time stayed connected afterward. The mechanism wasn’t “being in the office.” It was connection engineered into a specific moment.
The benefit-cost ratio hit 5:1. That’s not just productivity. That’s retention. That’s people staying because they feel connected. Remote work isn’t the problem. Undesigned connection was. One day a month, done right, fixes it. The lesson isn’t “everybody come back.” It’s “engineer the moments that matter.”
Grant's ego framing is right, but it undersells what happens when that ego motive meets a CFO. India ran that experiment already: TCS tied office attendance directly to variable pay and promotions, so the control Grant describes stopped being a vibe and became a line item that claws back the remote premium employees were capturing (rent, commute and time) and reattaches it to nothing. Priced honestly that is a pay cut nobody put in writing, not a culture memo. And the tell it was never about the office: people who own a hard problem end to end still keep the flexibility the org chart says is gone, so what exactly is RTO once you read it as compensation?
Zia. itszia.ai